What Are The Standards For Educational Evaluation


Educational evaluation is the evaluation process of characterizing and appraising some aspect/s of an educational procedure.

Common purposes in educational evaluation:

A. Educational institutions usually need evaluation data to demonstrate effectiveness to funders and other stakeholders, and to provide a measure of performance for marketing purposes.

B. Educational evaluation is also a professional activity that individual educators need to undertake if they plan to continuously review and enhance the learning they are endeavoring to facilitate.

Standards for Educational Evaluation

The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation published three sets of standards for educational evaluations. Check for Educational Evaluations in US at UT Evaluators

A. The Personnel Evaluation Standards, published in 1988

B. The Program Evaluation Standards (2nd edition), published in 1994

C. The Student Evaluations Standards, published in 2003.

Each publication demonstrates and elaborates a set of standards for use in a variety of educational settings. The standards provide guidelines for designing, implementing, assessing and improving the identified form of evaluation. Each of the standards has been placed in one of four fundamental categories to promote evaluations that are proper, useful, feasible, and accurate.

A. The Personnel Evaluation Standards

The propriety standards ask that evaluations be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of evaluatees and clients involved.

The utility standards are designed to guide evaluations so that they will be informative, timely, and influential.

The feasibility standards call for evaluation systems that are as easy to implement as possible, efficient in their use of time and resources, sufficiently funded, and viable from a number of other standpoints.

The accuracy standards require that the obtained information be technically accurate and that conclusions be linked logically to the data.

B. The Program Evaluation Standards

The utility standards are intended to make sure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users.

The feasibility standards are planned to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal.

The propriety standards are intended to make sure that an evaluation will be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results.

The accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will disclose and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine worth or merit of the program being evaluated.

C. The Student Evaluation Standards

The Propriety standards assist to make sure that student evaluations are conducted lawfully, ethically, and with regard to the rights of students and other persons affected by student evaluation. For Educational Evaluations in US visit here

The Utility standards encourage the design and implementation of informative, timely, and useful student evaluations.

The Feasibility standards help ensure that student evaluations are practical; viable; cost-effective; and culturally, socially, and politically appropriate.

The Accuracy standards help ensure that student evaluations will give sound, accurate, and credible information about student learning and performance.

What Are The Purposes and Functions of Evaluation

Purposes and Functions of Evaluation: Evaluation plays a vital role in teaching learning experiences. It is an integral part of the instructional programmes. It provides information’s on the basis of which many educational decisions are taken. We are to stick to the basic function of evaluation which is required to be practiced for pupil and his learning processes. Check for Educational Evaluations in US at UT Evaluators

Evaluation has the following functions:

1. Placement Functions:

a. Evaluation helps to study the entry behaviour of the children in all respects.

b. That helps to undertake special instructional programmes.

c. To provide for individualisation of instruction.

d. It also helps to select pupils for higher studies, for different vocations and specialised courses.

2. Instructional Functions:

a. A planned evaluation helps a teacher in deciding and developing the ways, methods, techniques of teaching.

b. Helps to formulate and reformulate suitable and realistic objectives of instruction.

c. Which helps to improve instruction and to plan appropriate and adequate techniques of instruction.

d. And also helps in the improvement of curriculum.

e. To assess different educational practices.

f. Ascertains how far could learning objectives be achieved.

g. To improve instructional procedures and quality of teachers.

h. To plan appropriate and adequate learning strategies.

3. Diagnostic Functions:

a. Evaluation has to diagnose the weak points in the school programme as well as weakness of the students.

b. To suggest relevant remedial programmes.

c. The aptitude, interest and intelligence are also to be recognised in each individual child so that he may be energised towards a right direction.

d. To adopt instruction to the different needs of the pupils.

e. To evaluate the progress of these weak students in terms of their capacity, ability and goal.

4. Predictive functions:

a. To discover potential abilities and aptitudes among the learners.

b. Thus to predict the future success of the children.

c. And also helps the child in selecting the right electives.

5. Administrative Functions:

a. To adopt better educational policy and decision making.

b. Helps to classify pupils in different convenient groups.

c. To promote students to next higher class,

d. To appraise the supervisory practices.

e. To have appropriate placement.

f. To draw comparative statement on the performance of different children.

g. To have sound planning.

h. Helps to test the efficiency of teachers in providing suitable learning experiences.

i. To mobilise public opinion and to improve public relations.

j. Helps in developing a comprehensive criterion tests.

6. Guidance Functions:

a. Assists a person in making decisions about courses and careers.

b. Enables a learner to know his pace of learning and lapses in his learning.

c. Helps a teacher to know the children in details and to provide necessary educational, vocational and personal guidance. Educational Evaluations in US visit Here

7. Motivation Functions:

a. To motivate, to direct, to inspire and to involve the students in learning.

b. To reward their learning and thus to motivate them towards study.

8. Development Functions:

a. Gives reinforcement and feedback to teacher, students and the teaching learning processes.

b. Assists in the modification and improvement of the teaching strategies and learning experiences.

c. Helps in the achievement of educational objectives and goals.

9. Research Functions:

a. Helps to provide data for research generalisation.

b. Evaluation clears the doubts for further studies and researches.

c. Helps to promote action research in education.

10. Communication Functions:

a. To communicate the results of progress to the students.

b. To intimate the results of progress to parents.

c. To circulate the results of progress to other schools.